(left click to enlarge)The document lists Obama's parents as Barack Obama II and Stanley Ann Obama, formerly Stanley Ann Dunham, the birth date as Aug. 4, 1961, and the hospital of birth as Coast General Hospital in Mombasa, Kenya.
No doctor is listed. But the alleged certificate bears the signature of the deputy registrar of Coast Province, Joshua Simon Couya. It was allegedly issued as a certified copy of the original in February 1964.
Fascinating. A closer look at this thing shows Obama's Dad to be 26 years old, a student, in Honolulu Hawaii at the time of his son's birth, while his mother, 18, was - according to this document - giving birth at the Coast General Hospital in Mobassa, Kenya.
Much to be curious about here... how did a 17-year-old Kansas girl end up pregnant in Kenya? Pregnant by a Kenyan globe-hopping student in Hawaii?
Another thing... Year of present marriage is listed as 1961. Obama was born August 4, 1961, so unless his parents were married between the first and the forth of January, it would appear that Momma had been playing house with Daddy before marriage. Perhaps Daddy did the honorable thing and married Mommy... Before he skipped off to Honolulu to be a student.
Too bad Obama's mother suddenly died like she did, and at such a young age no less... She could have provided us so many answers.
4 comments:
Stanley's a funny name for a woman...You sure BHO's momma wasn't a dude?
Momma's Daddy wanted a boy. Next best thing was a boy's name.
QUESTION:
What happens to Judge Sotomayor’s confirmation as Supreme Court Justice if the Constitution’s “natural born citizen” Presidential eligibility requirement is subsequently determined applicable to Barack Obama on the basis of Article 2’s exclusion of dual citizenship birth (doesn’t matter whether Obama born in Hawaii since his dad was Kenyan/British citizen at the time)? It would seem prudent, if not dereliction of Constitutional duty in not so doing, for the United States Senate to defer voting on Judge Sotomayor’s confirmation at the very least until there is determination, now imminent, on standing in Kerchner v. Congress (USDC NJ) on that precise issue (Congressional failure to take up the raised and known constitutional ineligibility question prior to declaring a Presidential winner in the vote of the electoral college). For the full Senate now to proceed to vote to confirm Judge Sotomayor (an otherwise lifetime appointment) before then, would be a knowing and very substantial exacerbation of any inherent Constitutional crisis — compounding the previous Congressional dereliction. That is, the Executive Branch, as well as conceivably all actions of a Congress under a President determined ineligible, would leave the Supreme Court as an essential unfettered remaining Branch of the Federal Government, that is unfettered so long as Mr. Obama’s nominee to the Court is not yet confirmed by the Senate.
Will not one Senator, let alone Republican Senator, raise this issue on the Senate floor? The nation is watching.
Leave a Reply
Were you asking a question, or preaching from a soapbox? I do the soapbox stuff in this blog...
But to answer your question:
Simple. Any appointment made by or law passed by Osama is null and void if he is determined to be ineligible as POTUS.
He will also be arrested and convicted of fraud against the United States and sent to prison.
But I don't see that happening, the Watts crowd would run amok (again) and burn everything in sight, while looting everything else.
Post a Comment