Monday, November 29, 2010

The Wikileak Release

Congressman Peter King, the incoming chairman of the House Homeland Security Committee, called for WikiLeaks to be reclassified as a terrorist organisation after the latest release of top secret intelligence documents.

He claimed that the data breach was 'worse than a military attack. Said career politician King:

I am calling on the attorney general and supporting his efforts to fully prosecute WikiLeaks and its founder for violating the Espionage Act.

Whats really happening here?

These releases are exposing a level of deception, thievery, illegal activity and outright lies by our government officials that are astounding in their scope, and the measure of damage to us as a nation caused by these people and their actions is yet to be fully realized.

We need to be very careful before declaring any group that exposes these people and their tactics as violating our "Espionage Act", when these leaks are educating the American public about the absolute level of scumbaggery and outright evil being conducted in their name.

Embarrassing? Yes, for the governmental officials that are being exposed. Just listen to them scream.

Eye opening? Yes, for an American public that has been misled and compromised by individuals and groups that have no conscience, no honor, no allegiance to anything or anyone but themselves.

It is sad that this kind of official malfeasance can only be exposed by foreigners, rather than our own investigative agencies who are obviously asleep at the switch.

So... Before we throw the baby out with the bath water, let's just see which is dirtier.

If we've been played by these people, let's man up and handle the situation. But let's not kill the messenger.

2 comments:

yellowdoggranny said...

we live in the age of 'over reacting'...truth hurts...

TheWayfarer said...

Among the facts being ignored in this case are:
Wikileaks does not have bureaus everywhere collecting data, it only reports info "leaked" to it, therefore
Someone/group provided the information, with/without the consent of their overlords.
While its probable the accusations of sexual impropriety are true, it's more likely a ruse to grab the messenger/smokescreen to divert public attention from the evidence in the reports.
What are the chances this is ANOTHER false flag-esque setup to authorize more power-grabs and unconstitutional activity in the name of the police-action on "terror"?
I look for this to be swept under the rug as quickly as possible by the mainstream media if they can't turn it into an "O. J. Simpleton Bronco-chase" juicy bit of yellow press sensationalism!