Of Sinking Ships And Rats

The promoters and supporters of the Iraqi debacle are abandoning the Good Ship LollyBush like the rats they are.

Adelman has broken with the Bush team. He had an angry falling-out with Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld. He and Cheney are no longer on speaking terms.He believes that "the president is ultimately responsible" for what Adelman now calls "the debacle that was Iraq."

Perle says he still believes the invasion was justified. but he resents being called "the architect of the Iraq war," because "my view was different from the administration's view from the very beginning" about how to conduct it. How sad, this poor little promoter is now feeling "resentful".

However, Joshua Muravchik, a neoconservative at the American Enterprise Institute, said he is distressed "to see neocons turning on Bush" but said he believes they should admit mistakes and openly discuss what went wrong.

Says Muravchik: "All of us who supported the war have to share some of the blame for that...There's a question to be sorted out: whether the war was a sound idea but very badly executed. And if that's the case, it appears to me the person most responsible for the bad execution was Rumsfeld, and it means neocons should not get too angry at Bush about that."

Thats really nice of Muravchik... he wants to share "some fo the blame" for the loss of almost 3,000 Americans, the hundreds of billions of dollars wasted, the growing deep and intense hatred of America and all things American by billions of people worldwide.

That's a world-class red herring... the "execution" bit, since the true purpose of the war was to eliminate the Iraqi threat to Israel, which was quickly accomplished. Shortly after the statue of Saddam Hussein fell, Kenneth Adelman and other promoters of the Iraq war gathered at Vice President Cheney's residence to celebrate. The invasion had been the "cakewalk" Adelman predicted. Cheney and his guests raised their glasses, toasting President Bush and victory. "It was a euphoric moment," Adelman recalls.

Perle, Adelman and others advocated a robust use of U.S. power to advance the ideals of democracy and freedom, targeting Hussein's Iraq as a threat that could be turned into an opportunity... or so they are now claiming. Not so. It is a disaster that has been forced on America by these sons-of-bitches for no other reason than to prevent Isreal from having to face a serious enemy and absorb unacceptable losses in the process. Far better that America absorb them.

Those who have been using American power and wealth to promote the Israeli agenda in the Middle East took advantage of a shallow-minded, self-absorbed and delusional man to do so, and through him, used US power to eliminate a real threat to the existance of Israel.

Just how much should the United States do to protect Israel from the enemies it has made by creating a Jewish state in the middle of an Muslim hotbed? The claims being made by Perle and others of his ilk that the Iraqi war was to promote democracy is ludicrous... it was to protect Israel, no other reason.

Bush provided them with a perfect patsy, a man who wanted to bloody Saddam for his own personel reasons. Now, as this Iraqi disaster unfolds, these Jewish traitors are all pointing fingers at Bush for having misconducted the war, even though the real purpose of this war was quickly accomplished. Now it is America--not Israel and its supporters--that has to face the unsolvable mess we have been suckered into.

Yes, this Iraqi disaster is all really about Israel. America faces real and growing hatred world-wide because of the actions it has taken in the support of the Jewish state. It is Jewish money and Jewish political influence in Washington that has put us where we are today. American citizens, and particularily American Christians, are going to have to find an answer to the critical question of what to do about Israel and its role as "puppet master" of the American federal government.